Dr Katherine Froggatt; Professor Claire Goodman; Dr Merryn Gott; Dr Liz Lloyd
Lancaster University; University of Hertfordshire; University of Sheffield; University of Bristol
Whilst dying is an inevitable end point of the ageing of older
adults, this aspect of the ageing process is often ignored. This
symposium considered what we gain when we consider dying in old age with
respect to services, policy and society. The four presentations
considered different aspects of dying in old age: different diseases
that older people live and die with (heart failure and dementia);
particular settings of care in care homes where some older people live
and die; and policy imperatives that shape the care older people receive
towards the end and at the end point of life.
Living and Dying in a Care Home
Dr Katherine Froggatt, Lancaster University, UK
k.froggatt@lancaster.ac.uk
Care homes are places where a significant
proportion of older people die and are the focus of increased attention
from specialist service providers with regard to the provision of end of
life care in such settings. The cultural challenges of holding both
living and dying in such settings mirrors perspectives on dying and
death present in contemporary Western society. A number of studies have
identified the difficulties that arise in the provision of end of life
care in care homes for older people of holding both living and dying,
for the residents who live there, relatives who visit and staff who work
there. Drawing on recent participatory research undertaken in two
English care homes, how life and death are managed in this setting was
discussed with its relevance to understanding wider societal views of
ageing and dying.
End of life care for people with dementia: Challenges for specialist services
Professor Claire Goodman, University of Hertfordshire, UK
c.goodman@herts.ac.uk
Older people with dementia at the end of their
life are often subject to unnecessary investigations and treatments. The
majority of research on palliative care for people with a diagnosis of
dementia has been undertaken in specialist units and hospices. Less is
known about providing palliative care for this population when they are
being supported at home or in care homes. This paper drew on the
findings from an integrative review of qualitative and quantitative
studies on palliative care for community dwelling older people with
dementia and their carers. Identifying research studies that address the
palliative care needs of people that die with, but not necessarily
from, dementia was problematic. This reflects the way in which current
care provision for dying people is based on particular assumptions. The
extent to which the research evidence supports these assumptions and
current service provision for end of life care for this population was
discussed. The relevance of the most commonly used outcome indicators
for quality end of life care for older people with dementia was
questioned. The need to redefine and reframe palliative care for a
population with such complex and long term needs was presented.
Dying with Heart Failure
Dr Merryn Gott, University of Sheffield, UK
m.gott@sheffield.ac.uk
This paper drew on a recently completed
longitudinal study which used mixed methods to explore how older people
in England live and die with heart failure. 542 people >60 and 213 of
their informal carers were followed over 2 years (or until death) to
explore quality of life and views about service provision. A particular
focus of the discussion will be upon the ways in which participants
understood a ‘good death’. A comparison was drawn between these accounts
and the philosophy underpinning specialist palliative care delivery.
This challenged the assumption widespread in practice and policy that
specialist palliative care is the best (and maybe only) means of
improving the end of life experiences of older people.
Policy and ageing and dying
Dr Liz Lloyd, University of Bristol, UK
liz.lloyd@bristol.ac.uk
The contemporary policy framework relevant to
death and dying in old age is subject to important changes. This paper
highlighted key policy trends and discussed the ways in which these have
been influenced by a range of actors within the policy process. A
crucial aspect of the discussion concerns recent thinking within policy
circles on the application of ‘best practice’ in cancer care to the care
of older people. Prevalent cultural norms and values are reflected in
policies on death and dying in old age. The focus on policies is
situated in a broader discussion of ageing and death within Western
culture and provides a critical analysis of key concepts employed within
policy outputs. The concept of ‘dignity’, for example, is now widely
used in policies and practices, and is seen to have particular resonance
for care and support at the end of life. The paper offered an analysis
of the ways in which contemporary policy changes on death and dying in
old age may be conceptualised as both progressive and contradictory and
will consider the implications of current developments in this area of
policy for gerontological knowledge.
The papers raised a number of common issues that
led to a lively discussion at the end of the symposium. This included
the way in which older adults may be set apart either because of their
health condition or the place in which they live. Whilst issues of
preference, choice, and autonomy were raised in the policy paper, these
ideas were also implicitly present in all the papers where people’s
experiences were considered. (NB for people with dementia, there is
little literature that considers their experiences towards the end of
life).
In the discussion the notion of entitlement was
raised, which draws on a citizenship perspective, rather than a health
care view to understand what it is older people want towards the end of
life. It was agreed this seminar brought into perspective some
experiences and meanings of dying in old age that are infrequently
considered or developed.