Message from Dr Kate Davidson, President of the British Society of Gerontology.
Bangor and its excellent scientific
meeting, not to mention the stunning environment and wonderful weather,
seems far away now and I have had the chance to settle into the role of
President when I succeeded Professor Chris Phillipson. As Past
President, Chris remains an invaluable asset to the Society in his role
as principal liaison with the British Council for Ageing (BCA)
comprising the British Geriatric Society, the British Society of
Gerontology and the British Society for Research into Ageing. The launch of the BCA at the House of Lords in October was an
excellent event and all three societies trumpeted optimistic notes for
its future as an organisation that can speak at national level for the
learned societies concerned with the various aspects of old age and the
ageing process.
Professor Judith Phillips as President Elect
and I have arrived at a time of enormous change for the Society, the
biggest being our foray into the great information highway on the web
for the delivery of Generations Review. In many ways it has been sad
parting with the hard copy and there is no doubt that the general
appearance and high quality content wrought by Professor Sarah Harper,
Dr George Leeson and the Oxford team brought about a great improvement
in the house journal. A three year contract was agreed and extra funds
were allocated from the BSG account. Sadly, the extra work and costs
involved with this substantial change did not fulfil the two principal
aims behind the change: an increase in BSG membership numbers and
revenue from advertising. This meant that in its printed form,
Generations Review is unsustainable, and with much regret and gnashing
of teeth, the Executive Committee and the members at the AGM decided to
cease hard copy publication of the house journal. It goes without saying
that my personal, and the Executive Committee's thanks are to Sarah,
George and the team for lifting the journal to another level.
However, what the move has facilitated, is a
much more flexible, accessible and interactive means of communication
with the membership, the vast majority of whom have internet connection
and have agreed to accept GR on-line. I know this is the beginning of an
another exciting and innovative period in our history and thanks go to
the University of Reading team who have taken over, pushing, we hope, on
an open door.
Additionally, the reconstructed web site has
brought us into the 21st century with our membership renewal, which
ultimately will be entirely electronic, and enabled us to engage the
services of the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) for the renewal process.
It also means a saving to those who choose to pay by credit card and an
opportunity to pay by direct debit. CAF is offers a cost effective
service for us, and we hope this is the beginning of a long and fruitful
association.
We are aware that these two dramatic changes
will inevitably cause some initial confusion, but in the long run will
benefit the society hugely.
Ageing and Society (ASO), under the editorship of Professor Tony Warnes has gone from strength to strength, and he reports
that the standard of submissions has improved considerably over the
last couple of years. It is planned that the number of issues will
increase to eight a year in 2008. This brings me to another potential
change for BSG. I have thought for some time that it would be beneficial
for the society to have a peer reviewed journal as part of the
membership subscription, similar to the British Sociological Association
and the Social Policy Association. Now that we have on-line GR, it may
be time to revisit this idea. Economy of scale means that Cambridge
University Press (CUP) can offer the journal to BSG at a lower rate than
currently agreed and it may be possible to absorb some of the cost into
the current membership subscription. However, the increase in the
number of issues means there will need to be an increase in the
subscription overall, and it will be greater than normal 'indexing'.
Approximately half the membership opt to take ASO at the moment. For
these members it would mean a decrease in their annual payment
(currently membership fee + £29) but the remaining half would face an
increase. I would be very interested to hear your opinion and reaction
to this prospect and urge you to contact website@britishgerontology.org with your comments which will be fed back to me and the Executive Committee.
Something we have not been particularly good at
in the past is setting up a forum for career advancement and job
possibilities. I was amazed at the American Sociological Association
(ASA) meeting in Montreal last August, and the Gerontological Society of
America (GSA) in Dallas in November, how much time and energy was
invested in advertising and recruitment of academics, not only 'emerging
scholars', but for those more senior academics who want/need change for
personal or promotional reasons. I am aware that the britishgerontology
e-mail list has been a useful method of disseminating appointments
information, but the web site now gives us the opportunity to extend
this service to a dedicated area, and not just for postgraduates.
And talking of GSA, it would be marvellous to
extend our presence and influence at this prestigious annual conference.
Professor Mary Gilhooly usually held an informal reception at GSA, but
last year, for the first time, the BSG hosted a formal reception
advertised in the programme in Dallas and attended by over 60 delegates.
Feedback tells me it was much appreciated by the attending BSG members
and other invited guests. This event put us on the reception 'circuit'
(which attracts cruisers as well as invitees), and importantly raises
the profile of BSG. CUP expressed an interest in sponsoring a formal
reception at GSA, and perhaps next time we can offer more than peanuts
and pretzels for nibbles. So, the next meeting is in San Francisco,
16-20 November www.geron.org . We
plan not only to have another reception but to arrange a joint USA/UK
seminar and we'll be keeping you in touch with our progress on this.
So, 2007 bodes well following the upheaval of 2006, and I am optimistic that we have taken the right direction.
I hope to see many of you in St Petersburg in
July (don't forget your mosquito repellent). I hope you haven't missed
the early bird deadline which was 31 December 2006, rather puzzlingly a
month before the abstract submission deadline of 1 February 2007.
Until then, I speak on behalf of the whole Executive Committee in wishing you a great start to the New Year, and health and happiness throughout.
Kate