Lecturer in Social Gerontology, Institute of Gerontology, King’s College London
Background
For about 15 years I was a barrister
working in family and child law, with a particular interest in long term
financial consequences of divorce. After many years of talking about
it, I decided to take a year out from my practice to research the
pension position of divorced men and women. I did a Masters at the
University of Surrey, supervised by Sara Arber. Absolutely loved it,
took to statistics like a proverbial duck, and I never left. A PhD
followed and I ultimately left my legal career for academia and
research.
I became interested in ageing through worrying
about what would happen to my female clients as they aged after divorce.
I couldn’t see where their pension income would come from given the
financial constraints that most divorced women live under.
PhD experiences
Title: Pensions, gender and changing family forms
University of Surrey, awarded 2005
My PhD was about how patterns of family
formation and dissolution impact on pension prospects for men and women
in the UK. This was an extension of my MSc dissertation, which had
looked at pension scheme participation of working age women according to
marital status. My thesis abstract itself is very dull! I wish I could
re-write it now and make it sound more interesting.
I studied full time, with funding from an ESRC
Research studentship. I chose Surrey for my MSc and PhD because I had
the opportunity to be supervised by Sara Arber.
Initially, I just thought I was taking a year off work to do some
research. I think the PhD chose me more than the other way round. The
decision after I completed my PhD to take an academic post and give up a
career in the law was a very difficult one for me.
What I enjoyed most about the PhD was the
intellectual freedom. But the change in my financial and social status
was a challenge. One of the best pieces of advice I was given during my
PhD was: You can’t know everything, so trying to is futile
(thanks Jo!). I’d advise others contemplating doing a PhD to be
absolutely sure that this is something you want to do, and that you are
completely fascinated by your subject – it’s just you and your thesis
for a very long time.
My Viva was a very fair assessment and tested
weaknesses that I knew existed in the conceptual framework. I’d advise
students about to do their Viva to read their thesis the previous day,
and to know and understand their examiners’ research interests.
Post-PhD
After completing my PhD I undertook
some consultancy work and then took a permanent lecturing post in Social
Gerontology at King’s College London. Finding a job was not difficult –
I had made many contacts in gerontology during my MSc and PhD and I
learnt informally about this post becoming available. I applied for it
when it was advertised and was very pleased to be offered the post. I am
a lecturer in a research institute, with my time reasonably evenly
split between lecturing to Masters students, taking on various
administrative roles in the Department (including co-ordinating two MSc
modules), and my own research.
BSG/NOGS
I think I was on a 3 line whip from my
supervisor and joined BSG when I started my PhD. It’s facilitated my
integration into the community of gerontologists. I regret not having
been a member of NOGS while doing my PhD. I now encourage our PhD
students at Kings to join.Being a memberprovides opportunities for networking events, and the chance to present conference papers in a supportive environment.
Future plans
I hope to secure research funding and
pursue various projects that are boiling away in my mind. Almost all
social issues are issues for the ageing population. I think tackling
social inequalities is paramount.