Dr Ruth Walker
Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia
I eagerly anticipated attending my first meeting of the British Society
of Gerontology and the 2008 meeting held at UWE in Bristol more than
lived up to my expectations. Delegates were presented with an engaging
and diverse program, show-casing a good mix of well-known and emerging
researchers. A relaxed and friendly atmosphere was present over the
entire conference, with plenty of opportunities to interact with fellow
delegates.
The presentations were grouped into the main conference themes of
long-term and community care, housing, sustainable communities, income,
families and intergenerational support, health and well-being, and
research methods. The number of concurrent sessions at times meant
missing out on some interesting talks, nevertheless I attended some very
inspiring presentations, all of which underscored the new ground being
forged in social gerontology and most leaving the audience with plenty
of enthusiasm for future research directions/unanswered questions. A
particular highlight for me was the presentation by a group of older
researchers (the North East Research Group) who described their work
involving focus groups and a survey of older people on the issue of
pensioner poverty in Britain, as underlined by the thought-provoking
title of their paper “do we heat or do we eat”? It struck me that the UK
is clearly making steps towards an emphasis on older people as
researchers in their own right as well as the more common involvement of
older people in research (as consultants or reference group members).
From my experience in Australia, our focus has to date been more on the
latter.
Another session with which I was particularly
impressed was that on writing for publication in social gerontology,
chaired by Mima Cattan. This session was very well-attended and included
talks on publishing in journals, writing chapters and the process
involved with writing proposals for edited books. I think integration of
this sort of ‘skills-building’ session with more formal research
presentations is a valuable adjunct to the conference.
Lastly, all three of the plenaries left me with much to ponder for the
future of ageing research, common to all in the developed world. Alex
Kalache, former Head of the Ageing and Life Course program at the WHO,
ended his plenary with a call for those in the 'north’ (developed world)
to not lose sight of the fact that those in the ‘south’ (developing
world) need our expertise, and that future gerontologists can play a
pivotal role in working with those poorer countries who will be facing
immense pressure in coming decades as their populations age in the
absence of relative wealth afforded to those in more developed settings.
As he stated, “those in the north got rich before they got old; those
in the south got old before they got rich”. The plenaries by both Mim
Bernard and Graham Rowles emphasised the importance of place and the
built environment for older people, with a view to looking ahead in
terms of sustainability of housing (Bernard) and embracing new
technology (Rowles). One stand-out feature of the conference for me was
the somewhat contentious notion suggested by Graham Rowles to consider
the role of virtual reality (including the use of avatars or virtual
representations of oneself) as a possible means of ensuring older people
retain their connections with ‘place’ when faced with possible
disconnection from their familiar surroundings in later life.
I found my attendance and participation at the BSG to be an immensely
rewarding experience. The hospitality of the conference organisers and
staff at UWE even made up for the incessant rain present for the three
days of the conference! The range of topics under discussion gave me an
appreciation of current directions in gerontological research not only
in the UK but also Europe. It was very pleasing to see the commonalities
in terms of the research and social policy emphases we have in
Australia, but also some areas to consider for possible future
expansion.
End of news and reviews section.